0.00/0.10	% Problem    : Vampire---4.8_6552 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.11	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.10/0.31	% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
0.10/0.31	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.31	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.31	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.10/0.31	% WCLimit    : 180
0.10/0.31	% DateTime   : Mon Jul  3 12:50:01 EDT 2023
0.15/0.31	% CPUTime    : 
0.15/0.42	Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QxRkncJb5p/Vampire---4.8_6552
0.15/0.42	# Version: 3.1pre001-ho
0.15/0.42	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.15/0.42	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.15/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Starting new_ho_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# post_as_ho12 with pid 6730 completed with status 0
0.15/0.42	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.15/0.42	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.15/0.42	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.15/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.42	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFMBN
0.15/0.42	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.15/0.42	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 98s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# ehoh_best_nonlift with pid 6738 completed with status 0
0.15/0.42	# Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift
0.15/0.42	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.15/0.42	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.15/0.42	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# No SInE strategy applied
0.15/0.42	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFMBN
0.15/0.42	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.15/0.42	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 98s (1) cores
0.15/0.42	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.15/0.42	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.15/0.42	
0.15/0.42	# Proof found!
0.15/0.42	# SZS status Theorem
0.15/0.42	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.15/0.42	thf(decl_22, type, epred1_0: $o > $o).
0.15/0.42	thf(cOMEGA_EXAMPLE, conjecture, (?[X1:$o > $o > $o]:(((((X1 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true)))&~((X1 @ (($true)) @ (~($true)))))&~((X1 @ (~($true)) @ (($true)))))&(X1 @ (($true)) @ (($true)))))&![X2:$o > $o]:(((X2 @ ((($true)=>($true))))<=>(X2 @ (($true)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QxRkncJb5p/Vampire---4.8_6552', cOMEGA_EXAMPLE)).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~((?[X1:$o > $o > $o]:(((((X1 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true)))&~(X1 @ (($true)) @ (~($true))))&~(X1 @ (~($true)) @ (($true))))&(X1 @ (($true)) @ (($true)))))&![X2:$o > $o]:(((X2 @ $true)<=>(X2 @ (($true))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cOMEGA_EXAMPLE])])])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$o > $o > $o]:(((~(epred1_0 @ $true)|~(epred1_0 @ (($true)))|(~(X5 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true)))|(X5 @ (($true)) @ (~($true)))|(X5 @ (~($true)) @ (($true)))|~(X5 @ (($true)) @ (($true)))))&((epred1_0 @ $true)|(epred1_0 @ (($true)))|(~(X5 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true)))|(X5 @ (($true)) @ (~($true)))|(X5 @ (~($true)) @ (($true)))|~(X5 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o > $o]:(((X1 @ (($true)) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))|(X1 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (($true)))|~((epred1_0 @ (($true))))|~((epred1_0 @ (($true))))|~((X1 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (((($true))!=(($true))))))|~((X1 @ (($true)) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (($true)))|(epred1_0 @ (($true)))|(X1 @ (($true)) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))|(X1 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (($true)))|~((X1 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (((($true))!=(($true))))))|~((X1 @ (($true)) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o > $o]:(((X1 @ (($true)) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))|(X1 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (($true)))|~((epred1_0 @ (($true))))|~((X1 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))|~((X1 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o > $o]:(((epred1_0 @ (($true)))|(X1 @ (($true)) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))|(X1 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (($true)))|~((X1 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))|~((X1 @ (((($true))!=(($true)))) @ (((($true))!=(($true)))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o > $o]:(((X1 @ (~($true)) @ (($true)))|(X1 @ (($true)) @ (~($true)))|~((X1 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))|~((X1 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true))))|~((epred1_0 @ (($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o > $o]:(((X1 @ (~($true)) @ (($true)))|(X1 @ (($true)) @ (~($true)))|(epred1_0 @ (($true)))|~((X1 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))|~((X1 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ (($true)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$o > $o > $o]:(((X1 @ (($true)) @ (~($true)))|(X1 @ (~($true)) @ (($true)))|~((X1 @ (($true)) @ (($true))))|~((X1 @ (~($true)) @ (~($true)))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.15/0.42	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]), ['proof']).
0.15/0.42	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.15/0.42	# Parsed axioms                        : 1
0.15/0.42	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.15/0.42	# Initial clauses                      : 2
0.15/0.42	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.15/0.42	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
0.15/0.42	# Processed clauses                    : 6
0.15/0.42	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.15/0.42	# ...subsumed                          : 1
0.15/0.42	# ...remaining for further processing  : 5
0.15/0.42	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.15/0.42	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.15/0.42	# Backward-subsumed                    : 1
0.15/0.42	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.15/0.42	# Generated clauses                    : 38
0.15/0.42	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
0.15/0.42	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.15/0.42	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.15/0.42	# Paramodulations                      : 0
0.15/0.42	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.15/0.42	# NegExts                              : 0
0.15/0.42	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.15/0.42	# Total rewrite steps                  : 0
0.15/0.42	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.15/0.42	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.15/0.42	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.15/0.42	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.15/0.42	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.15/0.42	# Current number of processed clauses  : 2
0.15/0.42	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
0.15/0.42	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.15/0.42	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.15/0.42	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.15/0.42	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
0.15/0.42	# ...number of literals in the above   : 5
0.15/0.42	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.15/0.42	# Current number of archived clauses   : 3
0.15/0.42	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
0.15/0.42	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.15/0.42	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.15/0.42	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.15/0.42	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.15/0.42	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.15/0.42	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.15/0.42	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.15/0.42	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.15/0.42	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1288
0.15/0.42	
0.15/0.42	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.42	# User time                : 0.002 s
0.15/0.42	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.15/0.42	# Total time               : 0.004 s
0.15/0.42	# Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
0.15/0.42	
0.15/0.42	# -------------------------------------------------
0.15/0.42	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.15/0.42	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.15/0.42	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.15/0.42	# Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
0.15/0.42	% E---3.1 exiting
0.15/0.43	EOF